Blog
December 3, 2025

Sam Altman Paused Agents. Here’s Why You Should Audit Your Permissions.

Sam Altman paused OpenAI’s agents, but the real threat is already inside. Google’s Gemini 3 is now live in your workspace. The agent might be safe, but with your current permissions, is your data?

Download
Download

The generative‑AI boom has CISOs asking a hard question: Are we about to expose sensitive data we didn’t even know existed?

AI agents are extraordinarily good at retrieving, correlating, and resurfacing information buried deep inside SaaS tools. But this week, the narrative shifted. Reports surfaced of an internal note from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, declaring a strategic "Code Red" effectively halting the release of autonomous agent products (like shopping and health assistants) to focus on survival against Google’s Gemini 3.

While the memo was triggered by a battle for model dominion, it underscores a deeper truth for enterprise security: If the world's leading AI lab is hitting the brakes on agents due to complexity and resource demands, the enterprise environment is likely not ready to host them safely.

This article breaks down what the industry signals really mean, why the "pause" actually heightens your risk, and what CISOs must do to prepare their data layer.

What Sam Altman’s Note Really Means

Multiple outlets reported that OpenAI leadership has shifted focus back to improving core model reasoning rather than pushing agent-based products. This was a direct response to the launch of Google’s Gemini 3, which has integrated deeply into the Google Workspace ecosystem.

The strategic signal:

  • Reliability is the bottleneck: OpenAI paused agents because ensuring they act predictably at scale is incredibly resource-intensive.
  • The threat has shifted to the platform: While OpenAI pauses, Google is accelerating. Because Gemini 3 is native to the tools where your data lives (Docs, Drive, Gmail), the "agent" isn't an external tool anymore, it’s actually the infrastructure itself.

What the note does not solve:

The memo pauses OpenAI’s consumer agents, but it does not fix the data exposure risks inside your enterprise. Model-level safety does not protect you if your underlying SaaS data environment contains:

  • Overshared files (Public links)
  • Unclassified sensitive data
  • Legacy permissions
  • Forgotten documents containing PII, PCI, PHI, or secrets

In other words: The model may be "paused" at OpenAI, but it is "active" in your Google Drive. The agent is safe, but your data isn’t.

Why AI Agents Are a New Category of Data Risk

1. AI amplifies data you forgot existed

Enterprises accumulate years of unstructured information across tools like Slack, Google Drive, Jira, Notion, Box, and email. This historical data was never designed to be consumed by an always‑on, context‑aware AI assistant.

Once connected, an AI agent can:

  • Surface old PII buried in Slack threads
  • Reference confidential financial data stored in a shared drive
  • Expose customer information tucked inside Jira tickets
  • Leak secrets present in outdated documentation

This is not misuse, it’s simply AI doing what it does best: retrieving and synthesizing.

2. Shadow AI and "Native" AI increase uncontrolled access

It is no longer just about employees using unauthorized tools ("Shadow AI"). The bigger risk is "Native AI." With Copilot in Microsoft 365 and Gemini in Google Workspace, the agents are already inside the perimeter. If a user has permission to view a file (even an old, forgotten one) the agent can summarize it, extract data from it, and present it in a chat.

A surge of employee‑driven AI experimentation means data may be uploaded, accessed, or processed without security approval. Meanwhile, organizations have high AI adoption but low AI governance, widening the exposure surface.

3. Agentic behavior bypasses traditional controls

Emerging research highlights a sobering reality:

  • AI agents can take autonomous actions across data sources.
  • Retrieval‑augmented generation and fine‑tuned models can leak sensitive content.
  • Standard access controls are not consistently enforced at inference time.

4. Compliance, privacy, and audit risk explode

AI doesn’t just access data — it may replicate, store, or transform it in ways that violate:

  • GDPR data minimization principles
  • CCPA disclosure rules
  • SOC2 and ISO27001 evidence requirements
  • Industry‑specific mandates in finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure

This turns technical exposure into regulatory exposure.

The CISO Playbook: How to Prepare Before Deploying AI Agents

1. Inventory and map every SaaS data repository

This includes:

  • Google Drive & Shared Drives
  • Slack
  • Jira & Confluence
  • Email archives
  • Notion, Dropbox, Box, Salesforce

You can’t protect what you can’t see.

2. Classify sensitive data with precision

Manual data‑mapping fails instantly at enterprise scale. You need automated, accurate classifiers for:

  • PII
  • PHI
  • PCI
  • API keys & credentials
  • Financial documents
  • Customer records
  • Legal contracts

3. Fix over‑permissive access (The "Public Link" Problem)

AI agents inherit access patterns. If a file is set to "Anyone with the link," the AI agent can read it. If "Everyone in Organization" can view a salary spreadsheet, the AI can answer questions about it. You must audit and revoke broad sharing settings immediately.

4. Establish AI‑specific governance policies

Define:

  • Which agents can access which sources
  • What data they can retrieve
  • How results may be logged, summarized, or stored
  • Who approves new integrations

5. Build continuous monitoring and remediation into operations

AI readiness isn’t a one‑off project. New data risk appears as employees:

  • Upload files
  • Modify permissions
  • Post sensitive information in chat
  • Create new documents

Continuous detection and remediation is now mandatory.

What CISOs Need Now

Visibility

Metomic gives a real-time map of all sensitive data across SaaS systems, specifically highlighting the "forgotten data" that AI agents love to surface.

Accurate classification

Classifier precision matters. False positives cause alert fatigue; false negatives get you breached. Metomic’s classifiers strike the balance required for high-speed AI environments.

Context: who owns what and who has access

AI agents operate on permissions. Metomic detects files with dangerous sharing settings (e.g., "Public to Internet" or "Company-Wide") and identifies who owns them, allowing you to lock down the data layer before an agent exploits it.

Automated & user‑friendly remediation

Instead of creating bottlenecks, Metomic:

  • Revokes risky sharing automatically
  • Redacts sensitive data in transit
  • Engages employees in real-time with Slack and email nudges
  • Enforces policies without blocking productivity

This goes being simple DLP. It’s data hygiene and the prerequisite for safe AI adoption.

AI Doesn’t Create the Risk - It Reveals It

Sam Altman’s "Code Red" may have slowed down OpenAI’s specific agent roadmap, but it accelerated the industry's realization that data hygiene is the new perimeter. Whether it comes from OpenAI, Google, or Microsoft, the AI agent is an unpredictable amplifier of your existing data state.

Before you let Gemini or Copilot run loose in your SaaS ecosystem, make sure you:

  1. Know what data you have.
  2. Know where it lives.
  3. Know who (and what) can access it.

AI will not wait for your data to become tidy. It will act on it immediately.

Contact our team to find how we Metomic helps you get AI-ready.

The generative‑AI boom has CISOs asking a hard question: Are we about to expose sensitive data we didn’t even know existed?

AI agents are extraordinarily good at retrieving, correlating, and resurfacing information buried deep inside SaaS tools. But this week, the narrative shifted. Reports surfaced of an internal note from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, declaring a strategic "Code Red" effectively halting the release of autonomous agent products (like shopping and health assistants) to focus on survival against Google’s Gemini 3.

While the memo was triggered by a battle for model dominion, it underscores a deeper truth for enterprise security: If the world's leading AI lab is hitting the brakes on agents due to complexity and resource demands, the enterprise environment is likely not ready to host them safely.

This article breaks down what the industry signals really mean, why the "pause" actually heightens your risk, and what CISOs must do to prepare their data layer.

What Sam Altman’s Note Really Means

Multiple outlets reported that OpenAI leadership has shifted focus back to improving core model reasoning rather than pushing agent-based products. This was a direct response to the launch of Google’s Gemini 3, which has integrated deeply into the Google Workspace ecosystem.

The strategic signal:

  • Reliability is the bottleneck: OpenAI paused agents because ensuring they act predictably at scale is incredibly resource-intensive.
  • The threat has shifted to the platform: While OpenAI pauses, Google is accelerating. Because Gemini 3 is native to the tools where your data lives (Docs, Drive, Gmail), the "agent" isn't an external tool anymore, it’s actually the infrastructure itself.

What the note does not solve:

The memo pauses OpenAI’s consumer agents, but it does not fix the data exposure risks inside your enterprise. Model-level safety does not protect you if your underlying SaaS data environment contains:

  • Overshared files (Public links)
  • Unclassified sensitive data
  • Legacy permissions
  • Forgotten documents containing PII, PCI, PHI, or secrets

In other words: The model may be "paused" at OpenAI, but it is "active" in your Google Drive. The agent is safe, but your data isn’t.

Why AI Agents Are a New Category of Data Risk

1. AI amplifies data you forgot existed

Enterprises accumulate years of unstructured information across tools like Slack, Google Drive, Jira, Notion, Box, and email. This historical data was never designed to be consumed by an always‑on, context‑aware AI assistant.

Once connected, an AI agent can:

  • Surface old PII buried in Slack threads
  • Reference confidential financial data stored in a shared drive
  • Expose customer information tucked inside Jira tickets
  • Leak secrets present in outdated documentation

This is not misuse, it’s simply AI doing what it does best: retrieving and synthesizing.

2. Shadow AI and "Native" AI increase uncontrolled access

It is no longer just about employees using unauthorized tools ("Shadow AI"). The bigger risk is "Native AI." With Copilot in Microsoft 365 and Gemini in Google Workspace, the agents are already inside the perimeter. If a user has permission to view a file (even an old, forgotten one) the agent can summarize it, extract data from it, and present it in a chat.

A surge of employee‑driven AI experimentation means data may be uploaded, accessed, or processed without security approval. Meanwhile, organizations have high AI adoption but low AI governance, widening the exposure surface.

3. Agentic behavior bypasses traditional controls

Emerging research highlights a sobering reality:

  • AI agents can take autonomous actions across data sources.
  • Retrieval‑augmented generation and fine‑tuned models can leak sensitive content.
  • Standard access controls are not consistently enforced at inference time.

4. Compliance, privacy, and audit risk explode

AI doesn’t just access data — it may replicate, store, or transform it in ways that violate:

  • GDPR data minimization principles
  • CCPA disclosure rules
  • SOC2 and ISO27001 evidence requirements
  • Industry‑specific mandates in finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure

This turns technical exposure into regulatory exposure.

The CISO Playbook: How to Prepare Before Deploying AI Agents

1. Inventory and map every SaaS data repository

This includes:

  • Google Drive & Shared Drives
  • Slack
  • Jira & Confluence
  • Email archives
  • Notion, Dropbox, Box, Salesforce

You can’t protect what you can’t see.

2. Classify sensitive data with precision

Manual data‑mapping fails instantly at enterprise scale. You need automated, accurate classifiers for:

  • PII
  • PHI
  • PCI
  • API keys & credentials
  • Financial documents
  • Customer records
  • Legal contracts

3. Fix over‑permissive access (The "Public Link" Problem)

AI agents inherit access patterns. If a file is set to "Anyone with the link," the AI agent can read it. If "Everyone in Organization" can view a salary spreadsheet, the AI can answer questions about it. You must audit and revoke broad sharing settings immediately.

4. Establish AI‑specific governance policies

Define:

  • Which agents can access which sources
  • What data they can retrieve
  • How results may be logged, summarized, or stored
  • Who approves new integrations

5. Build continuous monitoring and remediation into operations

AI readiness isn’t a one‑off project. New data risk appears as employees:

  • Upload files
  • Modify permissions
  • Post sensitive information in chat
  • Create new documents

Continuous detection and remediation is now mandatory.

What CISOs Need Now

Visibility

Metomic gives a real-time map of all sensitive data across SaaS systems, specifically highlighting the "forgotten data" that AI agents love to surface.

Accurate classification

Classifier precision matters. False positives cause alert fatigue; false negatives get you breached. Metomic’s classifiers strike the balance required for high-speed AI environments.

Context: who owns what and who has access

AI agents operate on permissions. Metomic detects files with dangerous sharing settings (e.g., "Public to Internet" or "Company-Wide") and identifies who owns them, allowing you to lock down the data layer before an agent exploits it.

Automated & user‑friendly remediation

Instead of creating bottlenecks, Metomic:

  • Revokes risky sharing automatically
  • Redacts sensitive data in transit
  • Engages employees in real-time with Slack and email nudges
  • Enforces policies without blocking productivity

This goes being simple DLP. It’s data hygiene and the prerequisite for safe AI adoption.

AI Doesn’t Create the Risk - It Reveals It

Sam Altman’s "Code Red" may have slowed down OpenAI’s specific agent roadmap, but it accelerated the industry's realization that data hygiene is the new perimeter. Whether it comes from OpenAI, Google, or Microsoft, the AI agent is an unpredictable amplifier of your existing data state.

Before you let Gemini or Copilot run loose in your SaaS ecosystem, make sure you:

  1. Know what data you have.
  2. Know where it lives.
  3. Know who (and what) can access it.

AI will not wait for your data to become tidy. It will act on it immediately.

Contact our team to find how we Metomic helps you get AI-ready.

The generative‑AI boom has CISOs asking a hard question: Are we about to expose sensitive data we didn’t even know existed?

AI agents are extraordinarily good at retrieving, correlating, and resurfacing information buried deep inside SaaS tools. But this week, the narrative shifted. Reports surfaced of an internal note from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, declaring a strategic "Code Red" effectively halting the release of autonomous agent products (like shopping and health assistants) to focus on survival against Google’s Gemini 3.

While the memo was triggered by a battle for model dominion, it underscores a deeper truth for enterprise security: If the world's leading AI lab is hitting the brakes on agents due to complexity and resource demands, the enterprise environment is likely not ready to host them safely.

This article breaks down what the industry signals really mean, why the "pause" actually heightens your risk, and what CISOs must do to prepare their data layer.

What Sam Altman’s Note Really Means

Multiple outlets reported that OpenAI leadership has shifted focus back to improving core model reasoning rather than pushing agent-based products. This was a direct response to the launch of Google’s Gemini 3, which has integrated deeply into the Google Workspace ecosystem.

The strategic signal:

  • Reliability is the bottleneck: OpenAI paused agents because ensuring they act predictably at scale is incredibly resource-intensive.
  • The threat has shifted to the platform: While OpenAI pauses, Google is accelerating. Because Gemini 3 is native to the tools where your data lives (Docs, Drive, Gmail), the "agent" isn't an external tool anymore, it’s actually the infrastructure itself.

What the note does not solve:

The memo pauses OpenAI’s consumer agents, but it does not fix the data exposure risks inside your enterprise. Model-level safety does not protect you if your underlying SaaS data environment contains:

  • Overshared files (Public links)
  • Unclassified sensitive data
  • Legacy permissions
  • Forgotten documents containing PII, PCI, PHI, or secrets

In other words: The model may be "paused" at OpenAI, but it is "active" in your Google Drive. The agent is safe, but your data isn’t.

Why AI Agents Are a New Category of Data Risk

1. AI amplifies data you forgot existed

Enterprises accumulate years of unstructured information across tools like Slack, Google Drive, Jira, Notion, Box, and email. This historical data was never designed to be consumed by an always‑on, context‑aware AI assistant.

Once connected, an AI agent can:

  • Surface old PII buried in Slack threads
  • Reference confidential financial data stored in a shared drive
  • Expose customer information tucked inside Jira tickets
  • Leak secrets present in outdated documentation

This is not misuse, it’s simply AI doing what it does best: retrieving and synthesizing.

2. Shadow AI and "Native" AI increase uncontrolled access

It is no longer just about employees using unauthorized tools ("Shadow AI"). The bigger risk is "Native AI." With Copilot in Microsoft 365 and Gemini in Google Workspace, the agents are already inside the perimeter. If a user has permission to view a file (even an old, forgotten one) the agent can summarize it, extract data from it, and present it in a chat.

A surge of employee‑driven AI experimentation means data may be uploaded, accessed, or processed without security approval. Meanwhile, organizations have high AI adoption but low AI governance, widening the exposure surface.

3. Agentic behavior bypasses traditional controls

Emerging research highlights a sobering reality:

  • AI agents can take autonomous actions across data sources.
  • Retrieval‑augmented generation and fine‑tuned models can leak sensitive content.
  • Standard access controls are not consistently enforced at inference time.

4. Compliance, privacy, and audit risk explode

AI doesn’t just access data — it may replicate, store, or transform it in ways that violate:

  • GDPR data minimization principles
  • CCPA disclosure rules
  • SOC2 and ISO27001 evidence requirements
  • Industry‑specific mandates in finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure

This turns technical exposure into regulatory exposure.

The CISO Playbook: How to Prepare Before Deploying AI Agents

1. Inventory and map every SaaS data repository

This includes:

  • Google Drive & Shared Drives
  • Slack
  • Jira & Confluence
  • Email archives
  • Notion, Dropbox, Box, Salesforce

You can’t protect what you can’t see.

2. Classify sensitive data with precision

Manual data‑mapping fails instantly at enterprise scale. You need automated, accurate classifiers for:

  • PII
  • PHI
  • PCI
  • API keys & credentials
  • Financial documents
  • Customer records
  • Legal contracts

3. Fix over‑permissive access (The "Public Link" Problem)

AI agents inherit access patterns. If a file is set to "Anyone with the link," the AI agent can read it. If "Everyone in Organization" can view a salary spreadsheet, the AI can answer questions about it. You must audit and revoke broad sharing settings immediately.

4. Establish AI‑specific governance policies

Define:

  • Which agents can access which sources
  • What data they can retrieve
  • How results may be logged, summarized, or stored
  • Who approves new integrations

5. Build continuous monitoring and remediation into operations

AI readiness isn’t a one‑off project. New data risk appears as employees:

  • Upload files
  • Modify permissions
  • Post sensitive information in chat
  • Create new documents

Continuous detection and remediation is now mandatory.

What CISOs Need Now

Visibility

Metomic gives a real-time map of all sensitive data across SaaS systems, specifically highlighting the "forgotten data" that AI agents love to surface.

Accurate classification

Classifier precision matters. False positives cause alert fatigue; false negatives get you breached. Metomic’s classifiers strike the balance required for high-speed AI environments.

Context: who owns what and who has access

AI agents operate on permissions. Metomic detects files with dangerous sharing settings (e.g., "Public to Internet" or "Company-Wide") and identifies who owns them, allowing you to lock down the data layer before an agent exploits it.

Automated & user‑friendly remediation

Instead of creating bottlenecks, Metomic:

  • Revokes risky sharing automatically
  • Redacts sensitive data in transit
  • Engages employees in real-time with Slack and email nudges
  • Enforces policies without blocking productivity

This goes being simple DLP. It’s data hygiene and the prerequisite for safe AI adoption.

AI Doesn’t Create the Risk - It Reveals It

Sam Altman’s "Code Red" may have slowed down OpenAI’s specific agent roadmap, but it accelerated the industry's realization that data hygiene is the new perimeter. Whether it comes from OpenAI, Google, or Microsoft, the AI agent is an unpredictable amplifier of your existing data state.

Before you let Gemini or Copilot run loose in your SaaS ecosystem, make sure you:

  1. Know what data you have.
  2. Know where it lives.
  3. Know who (and what) can access it.

AI will not wait for your data to become tidy. It will act on it immediately.

Contact our team to find how we Metomic helps you get AI-ready.