Guides
December 10, 2025

The Best Netskope Alternative for SaaS Data Governance & AI Safety

Metomic gives enterprises real-time visibility into sensitive data across SharePoint, Google Drive, Slack and Jira — with automated remediation and AI-ready guardrails.

Download
Download

If you’re evaluating Netskope but need deeper, file-level visibility into collaboration tools and sensitive-data exposure, Metomic is built for that need. Netskope provides broad SSE and web/DLP coverage, while Metomic focuses on the places where risky data actually lives — inside SaaS tools like Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence and modern AI workflows.

Why Users Look for an Alternative

Organisations often choose Netskope as part of their secure access service edge (SASE) or SSE stack. But many eventually introduce Metomic when they need precise visibility into sensitive data stored and shared across collaboration tools, alongside new Shadow AI risks. Common reasons include:

1. Netskope excels at network/web protection, not collaboration-layer governance

Netskope’s strengths are secure web gateway, CASB, ZTNA and inline DLP.

But its visibility into sensitive documents spread across Drive, Slack or Jira is limited — especially when files are already overshared internally.

2. Limited context on file ownership, permissions and oversharing

Netskope focuses on classifying data in motion.

Metomic focuses on sensitive data at rest inside SaaS applications, where misconfigurations, public links and oversharing cause most enterprise breaches.

3. No Shadow AI monitoring or AI-lifecycle safeguards

Netskope can block risky destinations, but it isn’t built to show which files inside your SaaS tools are most likely to leak into LLMs.

Metomic surfaces overshared files, sensitive content and employee behaviours that create AI exposure.

4. Not designed for fine-grained SaaS Data Access Governance

Security teams want answers like:

Who can see this file? Where is sensitive data overshared? What’s public? What’s shared externally?

Metomic specialises in these insights.

5. Heavy configuration & slow time-to-value

SSE deployments take time.

Metomic's connection is agentless, via API, and delivers actionable results — usually within hours.

‍

Where Metomic Is Stronger

Metomic focuses on the environments where sensitive data is created, shared and mishandled daily, giving enterprises clear visibility and automated control.

1. Deep Collaboration & SaaS Visibility

Metomic scans and governs Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence, Notion, and SharePoint — identifying PII, PHI, PCI, credentials and financial models with high accuracy.

2. Shadow AI Monitoring & Guardrails

Metomic highlights which files could be inadvertently fed into AI agents or LLMs, and enforces guardrails to prevent that data leaving the organisation.

3. Data Access Governance & Oversharing Control

Surface misconfigurations, risky permissions, public links and shared-outside-domain files.

Fix issues instantly with automated workflows and user-driven remediation.

4. Real-Time SaaS DLP

Protect where people message, share and collaborate — not just where data travels.

Metomic applies targeted, context-rich DLP inside collaboration tools.

5. Enterprise-Ready for Regulated Industries

Metomic supports PCI, PHI, GDPR, SOC 2 and financial-sector regulatory expectations, scaling cleanly across thousands of employees.

6. Fast Deployment & Immediate Results

API-based setup gives security teams actionable insights within hours, without the architecture changes SSE tools usually require.

‍

Who Metomic Is Best For

Metomic is ideal for enterprises where sensitive data exposure directly affects compliance, customer trust and AI adoption:

  • FinTech, Healthcare and highly regulated industries
  • Security teams preparing for AI tools and AI agents
  • Companies standardising on Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence, Notion, or SharePoint
  • Organisations that need sensitive-data discovery inside collaboration tools
  • Teams needing automated remediation and permission hygiene

When to Choose Competitor

Netskope may be the right choice if:

  • Your priority is broad SSE coverage: SWG, CASB, ZTNA, inline DLP
  • Your biggest risks are network- or web-based rather than collaboration-based
  • You need a single platform for secure access, web filtering and threat prevention
  • You rely heavily on inline inspection rather than SaaS-native API coverage

Metomic becomes the better choice when your most sensitive data — and your highest-risk user behaviour — lives inside Slack, Drive, Jira and the collaboration tools where people actually work.

Table of content
Table of contents
Table of contents
Table of contents
Table of contents
Table of contents

If you’re evaluating Netskope but need deeper, file-level visibility into collaboration tools and sensitive-data exposure, Metomic is built for that need. Netskope provides broad SSE and web/DLP coverage, while Metomic focuses on the places where risky data actually lives — inside SaaS tools like Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence and modern AI workflows.

Why Users Look for an Alternative

Organisations often choose Netskope as part of their secure access service edge (SASE) or SSE stack. But many eventually introduce Metomic when they need precise visibility into sensitive data stored and shared across collaboration tools, alongside new Shadow AI risks. Common reasons include:

1. Netskope excels at network/web protection, not collaboration-layer governance

Netskope’s strengths are secure web gateway, CASB, ZTNA and inline DLP.

But its visibility into sensitive documents spread across Drive, Slack or Jira is limited — especially when files are already overshared internally.

2. Limited context on file ownership, permissions and oversharing

Netskope focuses on classifying data in motion.

Metomic focuses on sensitive data at rest inside SaaS applications, where misconfigurations, public links and oversharing cause most enterprise breaches.

3. No Shadow AI monitoring or AI-lifecycle safeguards

Netskope can block risky destinations, but it isn’t built to show which files inside your SaaS tools are most likely to leak into LLMs.

Metomic surfaces overshared files, sensitive content and employee behaviours that create AI exposure.

4. Not designed for fine-grained SaaS Data Access Governance

Security teams want answers like:

Who can see this file? Where is sensitive data overshared? What’s public? What’s shared externally?

Metomic specialises in these insights.

5. Heavy configuration & slow time-to-value

SSE deployments take time.

Metomic's connection is agentless, via API, and delivers actionable results — usually within hours.

‍

Where Metomic Is Stronger

Metomic focuses on the environments where sensitive data is created, shared and mishandled daily, giving enterprises clear visibility and automated control.

1. Deep Collaboration & SaaS Visibility

Metomic scans and governs Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence, Notion, and SharePoint — identifying PII, PHI, PCI, credentials and financial models with high accuracy.

2. Shadow AI Monitoring & Guardrails

Metomic highlights which files could be inadvertently fed into AI agents or LLMs, and enforces guardrails to prevent that data leaving the organisation.

3. Data Access Governance & Oversharing Control

Surface misconfigurations, risky permissions, public links and shared-outside-domain files.

Fix issues instantly with automated workflows and user-driven remediation.

4. Real-Time SaaS DLP

Protect where people message, share and collaborate — not just where data travels.

Metomic applies targeted, context-rich DLP inside collaboration tools.

5. Enterprise-Ready for Regulated Industries

Metomic supports PCI, PHI, GDPR, SOC 2 and financial-sector regulatory expectations, scaling cleanly across thousands of employees.

6. Fast Deployment & Immediate Results

API-based setup gives security teams actionable insights within hours, without the architecture changes SSE tools usually require.

‍

Who Metomic Is Best For

Metomic is ideal for enterprises where sensitive data exposure directly affects compliance, customer trust and AI adoption:

  • FinTech, Healthcare and highly regulated industries
  • Security teams preparing for AI tools and AI agents
  • Companies standardising on Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence, Notion, or SharePoint
  • Organisations that need sensitive-data discovery inside collaboration tools
  • Teams needing automated remediation and permission hygiene

When to Choose Competitor

Netskope may be the right choice if:

  • Your priority is broad SSE coverage: SWG, CASB, ZTNA, inline DLP
  • Your biggest risks are network- or web-based rather than collaboration-based
  • You need a single platform for secure access, web filtering and threat prevention
  • You rely heavily on inline inspection rather than SaaS-native API coverage

Metomic becomes the better choice when your most sensitive data — and your highest-risk user behaviour — lives inside Slack, Drive, Jira and the collaboration tools where people actually work.

If you’re evaluating Netskope but need deeper, file-level visibility into collaboration tools and sensitive-data exposure, Metomic is built for that need. Netskope provides broad SSE and web/DLP coverage, while Metomic focuses on the places where risky data actually lives — inside SaaS tools like Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence and modern AI workflows.

Why Users Look for an Alternative

Organisations often choose Netskope as part of their secure access service edge (SASE) or SSE stack. But many eventually introduce Metomic when they need precise visibility into sensitive data stored and shared across collaboration tools, alongside new Shadow AI risks. Common reasons include:

1. Netskope excels at network/web protection, not collaboration-layer governance

Netskope’s strengths are secure web gateway, CASB, ZTNA and inline DLP.

But its visibility into sensitive documents spread across Drive, Slack or Jira is limited — especially when files are already overshared internally.

2. Limited context on file ownership, permissions and oversharing

Netskope focuses on classifying data in motion.

Metomic focuses on sensitive data at rest inside SaaS applications, where misconfigurations, public links and oversharing cause most enterprise breaches.

3. No Shadow AI monitoring or AI-lifecycle safeguards

Netskope can block risky destinations, but it isn’t built to show which files inside your SaaS tools are most likely to leak into LLMs.

Metomic surfaces overshared files, sensitive content and employee behaviours that create AI exposure.

4. Not designed for fine-grained SaaS Data Access Governance

Security teams want answers like:

Who can see this file? Where is sensitive data overshared? What’s public? What’s shared externally?

Metomic specialises in these insights.

5. Heavy configuration & slow time-to-value

SSE deployments take time.

Metomic's connection is agentless, via API, and delivers actionable results — usually within hours.

‍

Where Metomic Is Stronger

Metomic focuses on the environments where sensitive data is created, shared and mishandled daily, giving enterprises clear visibility and automated control.

1. Deep Collaboration & SaaS Visibility

Metomic scans and governs Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence, Notion, and SharePoint — identifying PII, PHI, PCI, credentials and financial models with high accuracy.

2. Shadow AI Monitoring & Guardrails

Metomic highlights which files could be inadvertently fed into AI agents or LLMs, and enforces guardrails to prevent that data leaving the organisation.

3. Data Access Governance & Oversharing Control

Surface misconfigurations, risky permissions, public links and shared-outside-domain files.

Fix issues instantly with automated workflows and user-driven remediation.

4. Real-Time SaaS DLP

Protect where people message, share and collaborate — not just where data travels.

Metomic applies targeted, context-rich DLP inside collaboration tools.

5. Enterprise-Ready for Regulated Industries

Metomic supports PCI, PHI, GDPR, SOC 2 and financial-sector regulatory expectations, scaling cleanly across thousands of employees.

6. Fast Deployment & Immediate Results

API-based setup gives security teams actionable insights within hours, without the architecture changes SSE tools usually require.

‍

Who Metomic Is Best For

Metomic is ideal for enterprises where sensitive data exposure directly affects compliance, customer trust and AI adoption:

  • FinTech, Healthcare and highly regulated industries
  • Security teams preparing for AI tools and AI agents
  • Companies standardising on Google Drive, Slack, Jira, Confluence, Notion, or SharePoint
  • Organisations that need sensitive-data discovery inside collaboration tools
  • Teams needing automated remediation and permission hygiene

When to Choose Competitor

Netskope may be the right choice if:

  • Your priority is broad SSE coverage: SWG, CASB, ZTNA, inline DLP
  • Your biggest risks are network- or web-based rather than collaboration-based
  • You need a single platform for secure access, web filtering and threat prevention
  • You rely heavily on inline inspection rather than SaaS-native API coverage

Metomic becomes the better choice when your most sensitive data — and your highest-risk user behaviour — lives inside Slack, Drive, Jira and the collaboration tools where people actually work.

Latest posts

The Best Wiz Alternative for Enterprise Cloud & AI Governance

For teams comparing Wiz with broader data security needs, Metomic provides visibility beyond cloud posture management, extending into collaboration tools and data access governance. It helps organizations discover and reduce sensitive data exposure across modern environments, supporting stronger risk management as data sprawl increases.

Guides

Why You Need Stronger Google Drive Label Governance Before Exposure Grows

Data classification is foundational to every modern security programme, yet historically one of the least reliable due to its dependence on user behaviour. Metomic’s Google Drive Labelling feature fixes that by operationalising classification at scale.

Product